Sliding-mode anti-disturbance speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on an advanced reaching law

let’s break down the title “Sliding-mode anti-disturbance speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on an advanced reaching law” so you understand what it means and what it implies technically.

📌 Title Breakdown

✅ Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM)
A PMSM is a type of AC motor widely used in high-performance applications (like electric vehicles or robotics) because of its high efficiency, good torque density, and smooth rotation.

✅ Speed Control
This means the research is about controlling the rotational speed of the PMSM — which is critical for precise operation.

✅ Anti-Disturbance Control
In practice, motors face disturbances — e.g., load changes, parameter uncertainties, or external forces. Anti-disturbance control aims to keep the motor’s speed stable despite these unpredictable effects.

✅ Sliding-Mode Control (SMC)
SMC is a robust control strategy that forces the system’s states to “slide” along a predefined surface (the sliding surface) toward the desired state. It’s popular for its robustness against model uncertainties and disturbances — but can suffer from “chattering” (high-frequency oscillations).

✅ Advanced Reaching Law
In SMC, the reaching law governs how the system’s state reaches the sliding surface. An advanced reaching law usually improves traditional SMC by:

speeding up convergence,
reducing chattering,
or enhancing robustness.

⚙️ Key Idea

The paper (or project) likely proposes a new or improved “reaching law” to make the sliding-mode speed controller more robust and smooth for a PMSM, even when external disturbances or parameter variations occur.

📚 Typical Contributions

Such work would generally:

Design a new reaching law with better convergence properties.
Prove its stability using Lyapunov theory.
Simulate or experiment with a PMSM to show improved speed tracking, reduced chattering, and disturbance rejection.

✔️ Summary

This research focuses on keeping the speed of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor stable and robust against disturbances by using a sliding-mode controller enhanced with a more sophisticated law for driving the motor states toward the desired speed smoothly and efficiently.

deeper into the technical details of “Sliding-mode anti-disturbance speed control of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) based on an advanced reaching law.”

I’ll expand this in 4 parts:
1️⃣ Basics of PMSM speed control
2️⃣ Sliding Mode Control (SMC) framework
3️⃣ Advanced Reaching Law: concept & types
4️⃣ How anti-disturbance performance is improved

🔹 Basics of PMSM Speed Control

PMSM Dynamics
A PMSM is described by d–q axis equations in a rotating reference frame.
The general model is:

\begin{cases} v_d = R i_d + L_d \frac{di_d}{dt} - \omega_e L_q i_q \\ v_q = R i_q + L_q \frac{di_q}{dt} + \omega_e L_d i_d + \omega_e \lambda_f \\ T_e = \frac{3}{2} p (\lambda_f i_q + (L_d - L_q) i_d i_q) \end{cases}

$i_d, i_q$ — d–q axis currents
$v_d, v_q$ — d–q axis voltages
$L_d, L_q$ — inductances
$\omega_e$ — electrical angular speed
$\lambda_f$ — rotor flux linkage
$T_e$ — electromagnetic torque
$R$ — stator resistance

Speed dynamics:

J \frac{d\omega_m}{dt} = T_e - T_L - B \omega_m

$J$ — inertia
$T_L$ — load torque (disturbance)
$B$ — friction coefficient

The goal is to control $\omega_m$ accurately despite unknown $T_L$ and parameter variations.

🔹 Sliding Mode Control (SMC)

Basic Idea
SMC designs a sliding surface so the system’s state trajectory slides along it toward the desired state.

Define tracking error: $e = \omega_{m_{ref}} - \omega_m$
Sliding surface: $s = e + \lambda \int e\, dt$ (typical 1st-order)

Control Law
The standard SMC control input includes:

Equivalent control ( $u_{eq}$ ) — cancels nominal dynamics.
Switching control ( $u_{sw}$ ) — drives state to the surface.

u = u_{eq} + u_{sw} = u_{eq} - K \cdot \text{sign}(s)

Problems:

Chattering: High-frequency switching can excite motor vibrations.
Reaching phase: Before the state reaches the sliding surface, the system may not be robust.

🔹 Advanced Reaching Law

Reaching law defines how the system state reaches the sliding surface. A good reaching law:

Speeds up convergence.
Reduces chattering.
Increases robustness to disturbances.

Classic reaching law:

\dot{s} = -\eta \cdot \text{sign}(s)

Advanced Reaching Laws:
✅ Power Reaching Law (PRL)

\dot{s} = -k_1 s - k_2 |s|^\alpha \text{sign}(s) \quad (\alpha \in (0,1))

This smooths the approach and reduces chattering.

✅ Exponential Reaching Law (ERL)

\dot{s} = -k_1 s - k_2 (1 - e^{-\beta |s|}) \text{sign}(s)

✅ Adaptive Reaching Law

\dot{s} = -k_1 s - k_2 f(s) \quad \text{where } f(s) \text{ adapts to system states.}

The paper likely proposes such a law with:

Fast convergence far from the surface.
Smooth approach near the surface.
Lower steady-state chattering.

🔹 Anti-Disturbance Strategy

Main Goal:
Reject unknown load torque $T_L$ and parameter variations.

How SMC helps:

Robust by design: insensitive to model uncertainties.
Advanced reaching law: ensures system reaches the surface quickly, minimizing time under disturbance effect.
Some designs integrate a Disturbance Observer (DOB) to estimate $T_L$ in real time, and compensate for it in control law.

✔️ Putting It All Together

➡️ The control loop usually looks like:

Speed error → Sliding surface → Reaching law
Compute control input (voltage) for inverter.
PMSM responds, speed is adjusted.
Disturbances are suppressed by the sliding-mode action and the advanced reaching dynamics.

🧩 Typical Simulation / Experiment

✅ MATLAB/Simulink models PMSM & controller.
✅ Test scenarios:

Step load torque change.
Parameter uncertainty.
Speed tracking with sudden references.
✅ Plots:
Speed response.
Sliding surface evolution.
Control input waveform.
✅ Compare: classic SMC vs. advanced reaching law SMC.

📌 Key Benefits

✅ Faster convergence.
✅ Lower chattering.
✅ Better tracking accuracy.
✅ Stronger disturbance rejection.

Search This Blog

bestpaperaward